Sorry, you are talking about nature ... and there is even not a nature in the index of your book 🤦‍♂️ ... https://t.center/DeathPenaltyCruel/55 https://t.center/AnimalCrueltyFacts https://t.center/BauernprotestRealitat and with this example, you show even the fact, that death penalty should not be used everytime and everywhere. You can have a death penalty WITHOUT using it, just when needed! https://t.center/AmnestyBullshit/321 THIS IS WHAT PEOPLE ALWAYS FORGET Not that you come here "ops, it was better to have that" ... Do you need assisted suicide now, if you don't wish to die?? NOPE Do you need abortion now, if you are not pregnant?? NOPE Do you need ....? NOPE! This doesn't mean that you don't need such things in future too! Remember a) removing death penalty is synonym of HAVING AN HARD LIFE TO REIMPLEMENT THAT! https://t.center/EuropeFacts/55 https://t.center/EuropeFacts/56 https://t.center/EuropeFacts/36 https://t.center/EuropeFacts/69 b) or no way to reimplement that https://t.center/JohnBessler/132 c) don't forget Norway! https://t.center/BreivikDeathSentence/18 to https://t.center/BreivikDeathSentence/23 Synes du det hadde vært riktig om Norge innførte dødsstraff i forbindelse med denne saken, lurte aktor Inga Bejer Engh. Det hadde vært det riktige på mange måter. Skal man vurdere en sak som dette, er det bare to utganger. Jeg ser på 21 års fengsel som en patetisk straff, svarte Breivik. Do you think it would have been right if Norway introduced the death penalty in connection with this case, wondered prosecutor Inga Bejer Engh. It would have been the right thing in many ways. If one considers a case like this, there are only two ways out. I see 21 years in prison as a pathetic punishment, Breivik replied. https://t.center/BreivikBullshit/81 only 50 prisoners? Well, we already said that they get applied at too lower rate ... https://t.center/DefenceTelegram/1706 https://t.center/DeathSentenceFAQ/24 https://t.center/CrimeExamples/110