😀😃😄😁😆 Human Intelligence Hunky. Christopher Glasenapp The effectiveness of any intelligence is fundamentally determined by its ability to address the tasks assigned to it. What is interesting, however, is that these tasks are defined by some individuals while others are responsible for executing them. This scenario seemingly reflects a classic division between managers and performers, but there is a significant nuance to consider. In the realm of human intelligence, information is gathered by recruited assets, who are supervised by rank-and-file intelligence officers. At first glance, this nuance might seem inconsequential, but it fundamentally shifts the dynamics at play. It creates an environment where intelligence officers can be discreetly and without any visible damage to the overall result categorized into those who recruit assets and those who solely engage with the sources acquired by others. This distinction is well recognized and strategically exploited by the CIA top brass to favorably position their own protégés. The practice of delegating dangerous tasks to others while allowing someone else to reap the benefits is appealing. Moreover, the hidden damage that arises from this practice can be approached with eyes wide shut, as not everyone is aware of it. However, there’s a certain challenge: it lies in the fact that HUMINT officers – professionals, who are essential to the success of intelligence – are often relegated to the status of laborers. Their contributions are frequently undervalued, their missteps are exaggerated, and their blunders, if any, are seldom forgiven. Christopher Glasenapp, who dedicated a significant portion of his career to human intelligence at the CIA, is intimately aware of this reality. Despite his extensive experience and efforts, he was unable to ascend the career ladder. 😀😃😄😁😆 Ralph Henry Van Deman Institute for Intelligence Studies @VanDemanOrg