🇱🇧Developments in the situation: 1. Lebanon’s commitment to the settlement: Implementation of the ceasefire. Deployment of the Lebanese Army to enforce Resolution 1701. Extension of the Army Commander’s term. Call for the election of a President. 2. Violations by the enemy: Netanyahu adopts an escalation policy, interpreting agreements to serve his interests. Attempts to gain advantages through force not included in the terms of the agreement or battlefield outcomes. Hochstein repeatedly denied Netanyahu's claims regarding the agreement’s content. 3. Position of the Lebanese Army and political authority: Reliance on the U.S. as a guarantor to compel the enemy to honor its commitments. Belief that the U.S. will ensure compliance by the Zionist entity. Potential Scenarios: The ceasefire and agreement implementation may continue unless Netanyahu forces Lebanon into a response, which he could use as an excuse to renege on obligations. The U.S., as the guarantor, must pressure the Zionist entity to adhere to the agreement. Lebanon will maintain restraint, avoiding giving Netanyahu any pretext for escalation. This is a test of the seriousness of U.S. intentions to enforce Israeli compliance. @zulfiqarsociety