Jack Posobiec
Channel
153.66K
subscribers
13K
photos
5.33K
videos
19.2K
links
🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
What's the endgame of the Helene response? To break down these communities. To make them dependent, to force a migration from rural America into urban centers where control is easier, where votes can be more predictably harvested. It's about changing demographics, not just out of neglect but as a calculated move to shift the political landscape
The intentional neglect is part of a systemic bias within government policy. Policies are designed to subtly oppress or sideline certain populations, particularly those not aligned with progressive urban centers and subjugate groups that do not fit into the ideological framework
Allowing certain populations to suffer serves a political strategy to gradually shift populations away from rural, conservative areas towards more urban, liberal ones, thereby altering voting demographics
How the Unhumans Filter explains the Hurricane Helene response:
- Intentional Neglect: According to their thesis, if the government's response to a crisis like Hurricane Helene in Appalachia was inadequate, it could be framed within their narrative as an example of deliberate neglect or mismanagement. They argue that leftist ideologies, which they claim dominate current government operations, prioritize certain groups over others, potentially neglecting regions like Appalachia, which might be perceived as predominantly supporting opposing political ideologies or demographics (in this case, "poor white people").
- Systemic Bias: Posobiec and Lisec argue that this neglect is part of a systemic bias within government policy. They could contend that policies are designed not just to manage resources but to subtly oppress or sideline certain populations, particularly those not aligned with progressive urban centers. This could be seen as an extension of their claim that leftist movements aim to subjugate groups that do not fit into their ideological framework.
- Resource Allocation: From their perspective, the allocation of resources during and after Hurricane Helene might be interpreted as consciously misdirected. They might argue that funds, aid, or attention are diverted to areas or causes that serve the political narrative of the "unhumans" (those pushing for radical change), thereby neglecting regions like Appalachia, which could be seen as less likely to garner political favor or media attention.
- Historical Precedent: They could draw parallels with historical instances where government responses to natural disasters or economic crises seemed to disproportionately affect certain demographics, suggesting a pattern rather than isolated incidents. For instance, they might compare the response to Hurricane Helene with other historical events where they believe responses were politically motivated.
- Media and Public Perception: Posobiec and Lisec might argue that the media, which they often critique as being part of the leftist narrative, downplays or ignores the plights of these neglected areas, framing the narrative in a way that aligns with their political agenda. If media coverage of Hurricane Helene's impact on Appalachia was less compared to other regions or events, this could be cited as evidence of bias.
- Political Strategy: They might contend that allowing certain regions to suffer or recover slowly serves a political strategy, either to paint the opposition as ineffective or to gradually shift populations away from rural, conservative areas towards more urban, liberal ones, thereby altering voting demographics.
In summary, the thesis of "Unhumans" could be applied to argue that the government's response to Hurricane Helene was deliberately inadequate due to disdain for "poor white people” in middle America
- Intentional Neglect: According to their thesis, if the government's response to a crisis like Hurricane Helene in Appalachia was inadequate, it could be framed within their narrative as an example of deliberate neglect or mismanagement. They argue that leftist ideologies, which they claim dominate current government operations, prioritize certain groups over others, potentially neglecting regions like Appalachia, which might be perceived as predominantly supporting opposing political ideologies or demographics (in this case, "poor white people").
- Systemic Bias: Posobiec and Lisec argue that this neglect is part of a systemic bias within government policy. They could contend that policies are designed not just to manage resources but to subtly oppress or sideline certain populations, particularly those not aligned with progressive urban centers. This could be seen as an extension of their claim that leftist movements aim to subjugate groups that do not fit into their ideological framework.
- Resource Allocation: From their perspective, the allocation of resources during and after Hurricane Helene might be interpreted as consciously misdirected. They might argue that funds, aid, or attention are diverted to areas or causes that serve the political narrative of the "unhumans" (those pushing for radical change), thereby neglecting regions like Appalachia, which could be seen as less likely to garner political favor or media attention.
- Historical Precedent: They could draw parallels with historical instances where government responses to natural disasters or economic crises seemed to disproportionately affect certain demographics, suggesting a pattern rather than isolated incidents. For instance, they might compare the response to Hurricane Helene with other historical events where they believe responses were politically motivated.
- Media and Public Perception: Posobiec and Lisec might argue that the media, which they often critique as being part of the leftist narrative, downplays or ignores the plights of these neglected areas, framing the narrative in a way that aligns with their political agenda. If media coverage of Hurricane Helene's impact on Appalachia was less compared to other regions or events, this could be cited as evidence of bias.
- Political Strategy: They might contend that allowing certain regions to suffer or recover slowly serves a political strategy, either to paint the opposition as ineffective or to gradually shift populations away from rural, conservative areas towards more urban, liberal ones, thereby altering voting demographics.
In summary, the thesis of "Unhumans" could be applied to argue that the government's response to Hurricane Helene was deliberately inadequate due to disdain for "poor white people” in middle America
“The US government would never lie about the true death toll of a massive natural disaster just a few weeks away from election. That would never happen bc we live in a free country”
Trump raised money for hurricane victims
Harris raised money for BLM rioters
Harris raised money for BLM rioters
What if instead of sending billions to the wars overseas, we helped out people who were devastated here in America?
More